The more cameras that capture the police in action the more police misconduct we're seeing. The more videos we see of unarmed people being shot the more we're realizing the accounts of the police officers are being fabricated. We now understand that when a police officer shoots an unarmed person that officer - and their fellow officers - will do nearly anything to cover their tracks - including saying the suspect went for their gun when the suspect didn't and officers will sometimes move objects closer to the deceased's body so they can say they thought the suspect had a gun.
But more to the point, if you are more likely to be stopped by the police for identical behavior and you're more likely to be wrongly shot by the police because of your race - this is clear indication of racial bias. Considering these two factors it's not surprising the figures show that more unarmed black people are shot than unarmed white people.
Simon keeps trying to insinuate that "unarmed" isn't a clear enough distinction. He isn't wrong because all unarmed persons shot by the police are perfectly innocent. Rather, he's wrong because their's a disparity in the ratio of unarmed white persons shot compared to unarmed black persons (6 to 1).
If we assume for a moment that 50% of all unarmed shootings are justified - we would still have a disproportionate ratio of 6 to 1. The only way we can balance out the numbers in terms of race is if 0% of unarmed white people being shot by the police are justifiable - but a full 83% of unarmed black people being shot by the police are justifiable.